Subject | Re: [IBO] LookupCombo - seek nearest |
---|---|
Author | Ryan Nilsson-Harding |
Post date | 2002-11-11T01:47:24Z |
OK, thanks for another thorough reply!
Are you saying though, that once set up, the user will see the open-
case data in the combo, but when certain letters are hit, it uses
the upper-case column for selection?
I'm getting a little confused, but will definately give it a try.
-Ryan
Are you saying though, that once set up, the user will see the open-
case data in the combo, but when certain letters are hit, it uses
the upper-case column for selection?
I'm getting a little confused, but will definately give it a try.
-Ryan
>elegant
> Erm, normalisation is a great mechanism for getting a clean,
> database but there is no database theory book that rules that youshould
> eliminate redundancy at all cost, to the extent that you cannotuse your
> data! Theoretically you can normalise to 5N, but the generaland then
> recommendation is to normalise to 4N (eliminate all redundancy)
> wind back to "3N+" (sometimes called 3.5N) by applying commonsenseand
> knowledge of your implementation capability to your redundancyrules.
>insensitive "proxy"
> InterBase doesn't support case-insensitive indexes. The use of an
> automatically-populated (by BI and BU triggers) case-
> column (untouched by human hand) is a perfect example of wherecommon-sense
> should prevail over the religion of Redundancy and also where thesafely. As
> server-side features of the database help you to achieve it
> long as you never allow any user or external procedure to messaround with
> your proxy column, the risk associated with data redundancy willnever arise.
>column, unless
> Index the proxy column. Remove the index on the "original"
> you actually need case-sensitive ordering for something else.should stay
>
> >and I also do
> >not want purely uppercase fields.
>
> Your user-accessible data for stuff that you want in open case
> as it is. Just don't let your users get access to the proxyfields AT ALL
> - don't show them in the GUI.match on
>
> >The BDE lookup's can handle this, so I just thought I may have not
> >been doing something correctly.
>
> There's a great performance cost to forcing a case-insensitive
> both sides of the comparison---this is the BDE way, which is onlyefficient
> for desktop databases where the db structures are mapped directlyinto
> local memory.attribute
>
> You can do it "the BDE way" by applying the CASE INSENSITIVE
> without naming a proxy column, but why would you want to? IBOsupports the
> more efficient method that us old hands have always used forInterBase (and
> other client/server DBs) with or without the BDE, for highperformance in
> case-insensitive searches.
>
> Helen