Subject | Re: [IBO] Enh Components |
---|---|
Author | Geoff Worboys |
Post date | 2001-08-25T01:56:20Z |
Hi Pirtea,
I've recently discovered that BCB3 (and Delphi3?) does not support
overloaded pascal functions, so I am going to have to remove some of
the overloads I already have in Telesis_Utils.pas if I want to provide
support for these versions. Similarly there are problems with 64bit
integers in these versions.
I use search mode a lot. For the bitcheck controls (I use
BitCheckList more than BitCheckBox) I need server side support for bit
manipulations to support search mode. Last time I looked the standard
UDF lib bit functions were still integer based.
I do have my own UDF library - with my own imlementations of the bit
functions - that I guess I could update to provide 64bit variations.
I am not sure of the exact requirements for this at the moment. It
seems that IB/FB provide reasonably automatic casting of integer to
int64 and back again (at least for generator values), but I am not
sure if I like this or whether I would want separate implementations.
I got the code you sent through. Hopefully the above notes will
explain my reservations about using that code asis. This needs more
investigation and experiementation.
Geoff Worboys
Telesis Computing
> i've tried your components and i have found somethingI have considered 64 bit integers but there are a number of issues...
> that i like very much bit check box
> This is very cool and for me is very usefull,
> Have considered using int64 integers rather than
> 32 bit integer?
I've recently discovered that BCB3 (and Delphi3?) does not support
overloaded pascal functions, so I am going to have to remove some of
the overloads I already have in Telesis_Utils.pas if I want to provide
support for these versions. Similarly there are problems with 64bit
integers in these versions.
I use search mode a lot. For the bitcheck controls (I use
BitCheckList more than BitCheckBox) I need server side support for bit
manipulations to support search mode. Last time I looked the standard
UDF lib bit functions were still integer based.
I do have my own UDF library - with my own imlementations of the bit
functions - that I guess I could update to provide 64bit variations.
I am not sure of the exact requirements for this at the moment. It
seems that IB/FB provide reasonably automatic casting of integer to
int64 and back again (at least for generator values), but I am not
sure if I like this or whether I would want separate implementations.
I got the code you sent through. Hopefully the above notes will
explain my reservations about using that code asis. This needs more
investigation and experiementation.
Geoff Worboys
Telesis Computing