Subject | Re: [IBO] Record editing with Lookupcombo |
---|---|
Author | Riho-Rene Ellermaa |
Post date | 2001-07-23T17:12:12Z |
Actually it was more simple. I used automatically generated
UpdateSQL sentences and there was 1 row missing. Update SQL
is generated without primary key fields, but I wanted to
change this value.
UPDATE MAKSED SET
KMAKS = :KMAKS,
SUMMA = :SUMMA,
KULU=:KULU <<--- this row
WHERE
AASTA = :OLD_AASTA AND
KORTER = :OLD_KORTER AND
KULU = :OLD_KULU AND
KUU = :OLD_KUU
Riho-Rene Ellermaa
Ellermaa Tarkvaratöökoda
http://www.ellermaasoft.ee
linkage from the lookup dataset to the main dataset
references itself, through the join. IOW, i think it's
possible this can't work like this, i.e. changing this
value would violate all of the contributing relationships.
It's a circular reference.
UpdateSQL sentences and there was 1 row missing. Update SQL
is generated without primary key fields, but I wanted to
change this value.
UPDATE MAKSED SET
KMAKS = :KMAKS,
SUMMA = :SUMMA,
KULU=:KULU <<--- this row
WHERE
AASTA = :OLD_AASTA AND
KORTER = :OLD_KORTER AND
KULU = :OLD_KULU AND
KUU = :OLD_KUU
Riho-Rene Ellermaa
Ellermaa Tarkvaratöökoda
http://www.ellermaasoft.ee
>lookup dataset is suspect anyway., because the KeyLinks
> I think the relationship between the main dataset and the
linkage from the lookup dataset to the main dataset
references itself, through the join. IOW, i think it's
possible this can't work like this, i.e. changing this
value would violate all of the contributing relationships.
It's a circular reference.
>
> fwiw
>
> Helen
>