It would depend on the roadmap for the program. What I mean is that I myself
would need to know the goals and planned functionality also the scope, and
breth of the program. All this determines the architecture and design point.
In this kind of project it is always difficult because people see things
from
different perspectives and most of the times both is correct.

So in short I have no alternative.

Cheers
Gerhardus

-----Original Message-----
From: Jason Wharton [mailto:jwharton@...]
Sent: 11 April 2001 17:13
To: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: [IBO] Offtopic: Data replication.


BTW, Does anyone have an alternative to Borland's TService module as a
starting point?

Jason Wharton
CPS - Mesa AZ
http://www.ibobjects.com

----- Original Message -----
From: "DaveR" <mailings@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2001 11:59 AM
Subject: RE: AW: [IBO] Offtopic: Data replication.


> I agree that a generic Pascal version would be better.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerhardus Geldenhuis [mailto:linuxmail@...]
> Sent: 10 April 2001 09:02
> To: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: RE: AW: [IBO] Offtopic: Data replication.
>
>
> I agree that we should join efforts. I disagree on the NT Service module.
I
> feel the program should be generic pascal to make for easy porting to
kylix.
> This would also help to keep the code base simplified and not have two
> development trees.
>
> Cheers
> Gerhardus






Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/