Subject | Re: [IBO] Big Batch... |
---|---|
Author | Paul Schmidt |
Post date | 2001-03-19T15:07:18Z |
Hie Joen (and others):
Could someone tell me why a machine with multiple processors (2 or
more) would run IB more slowly?
I always thought that multi-processor(MP) support was only a concern
of the task manager/switcher within the O/S kernel. If the computer
is running more then 1 thread then it should be able to run half the
threads on each CPU. You do lose the time the task mananger is
operating, but that would mean 2 200MHz processors add up to around
375MHz rather then 400.
Could someone tell me why a machine with multiple processors (2 or
more) would run IB more slowly?
I always thought that multi-processor(MP) support was only a concern
of the task manager/switcher within the O/S kernel. If the computer
is running more then 1 thread then it should be able to run half the
threads on each CPU. You do lose the time the task mananger is
operating, but that would mean 2 200MHz processors add up to around
375MHz rather then 400.
On 17 Mar 2001, at 20:43, Hie Joen, Lie wrote:
To: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
From: "Hie Joen, Lie" <hiejoen@...>
Date sent: Sat, 17 Mar 2001 20:43:46 +0700
Send reply to: IBObjects@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [IBO] Big Batch...
> AFAIK Interbase performance in dual cpu is worst.
>
> HJ
>
> Admin wrote:
>
> > Workstation : 533mhz Celeron 128MB Ram
> > Server : Dual-Proc PPRO 200MHZ - unfortunately, disk is IDE, no RAID
> > or anything. But with one user, shouldn't be a significant
> > performance problem.
>
Paul Schmidt,
Tricat Technologies
Email: paul@...
Website: www.tricattechnologies.com