Subject | Re: [IBO] New Component |
---|---|
Author | Paul Gallagher |
Post date | 2001-01-27T14:02:48Z |
I started working on it last night. I am going to have a lot of questions
from more experienced programmers, so bear with me. <g>
While studying the IBO source, I have noticed that most of the components
have an underlying "custom" class. i.e. IB_Edit has IB_CustomEdit.
Is this required? Should I continue follow this paradigm?
TIA
Paul
from more experienced programmers, so bear with me. <g>
While studying the IBO source, I have noticed that most of the components
have an underlying "custom" class. i.e. IB_Edit has IB_CustomEdit.
Is this required? Should I continue follow this paradigm?
TIA
Paul
----- Original Message -----
From: <guido.klapperich@...>
To: <IBObjects@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 27, 2001 4:52 AM
Subject: Re: [IBO] New Component
> Paul, this is a great idea. I think you should follow the IBO-format.
>
> Guido
>
> Paul Gallagher wrote:
>
> > I am going to attempt to build an IBO aware version of the opensource
VirtualTree component. Before anyone gets too excited, it will only have
basic readonly functionality. -(
> >
> > Anyway, what is my best approach. Should I follow the format of all the
other IBO controls, so that sometime it could be possibly be merged with the
rest of IBO, or should I just build it using more conventional techniques?
> >
> > I realize this is a very open ended question, but I thought I would just
get any input before I get too far into it.
> >
> > TIA
> > Paul Gallagher
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
>
>
>