I have looked at the VirtualTree component. It seems quite powerful, but I
also see a lot of problem/bug reports on the egroups list. It is not
data-aware, but I have written a routine to populate the standard TTreeView
with hierachal data, so thats not a problem.

Does anyone have any opinions on the stability of this component? I don't
want to waste my time if it is going to be a headache. If it looks solid, I
will rework my code to make it work with IBO, and share it with the IBO
community.

Paul

----- Original Message -----
From: "Peter Danich" <Support@...>
To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2001 10:11 PM
Subject: Re: [IBO] Dream Company DBTree


> Paul,
> there is an extremely fast tree component (VirtualStringTree and
> VirtualDrawTree) at: http://www.lischke-online.de/VirtualTreeview.html
> It is free with full source code.
> For sure worth trying it!!!!
> Hope this will help, Peter
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Paul Gallagher <paul@...>
> To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 3:57 AM
> Subject: [IBO] Dream Company DBTree
>
>
> > Anyone out there using the DreamCo DBTree with IBO? I have a problem
with
> it trying to refresh the entire dataset when it refreshes the tree. It
> REALLY slows things down. Takes away all the speed advantages of IBO and
> then some. They are working on it, but I thought I would ask here if
someone
> has had the problem with it. On the other hand, I have been playing with
the
> TeeTree component, and it does not have this problem. I am just trying to
> evaluate which will serve my purpose better.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Paul Gallagher
> >
> >
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
>