| Subject | Re: [IBO] Re: Fields[xx].value - unidentifyed type: 14 |
|---|---|
| Author | Mauricio Longo |
| Post date | 2001-01-09T03:49:13Z |
Jason,
I can't really say, since I never really worried about how this was
implemented until now. I saw a suggestion earlier today by Kim Madsen
(author of kbMemTable) about using a different variant type. Do you think
this would work? Would it create any other knid of problems?
Let me explain to you why I was trying to use IBO and MemTable together. I
am working, as you know, in a queue application. I'm using IBO for all my
database work. It occurred to me that I could use, as many people do,
MemTable to create a database abstraction layer that would allow me to have
all my GUI apps totally independent of the underlying server.
I would then be at liberty to support other open source databases in the
future. (More easily.) I am, also, interested in using MemTable in the
creation of the 3-tier version of this application, since it has many
features that would make this much easier.
This is up to you, after all, who knows this stuff better.
All my best,
Mauricio Longo
I can't really say, since I never really worried about how this was
implemented until now. I saw a suggestion earlier today by Kim Madsen
(author of kbMemTable) about using a different variant type. Do you think
this would work? Would it create any other knid of problems?
Let me explain to you why I was trying to use IBO and MemTable together. I
am working, as you know, in a queue application. I'm using IBO for all my
database work. It occurred to me that I could use, as many people do,
MemTable to create a database abstraction layer that would allow me to have
all my GUI apps totally independent of the underlying server.
I would then be at liberty to support other open source databases in the
future. (More easily.) I am, also, interested in using MemTable in the
creation of the 3-tier version of this application, since it has many
features that would make this much easier.
This is up to you, after all, who knows this stuff better.
All my best,
Mauricio Longo
> What is our conclusion on how this should actually be resolved?
>
> Jason Wharton
> CPS - Mesa AZ
> http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Mauricio Longo" <mlongo@...>
> To: <IBObjects@egroups.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, January 03, 2001 11:50 AM
> Subject: [IBO] Re: Fields[xx].value - unidentifyed type: 14
>
>
> > Jason,
> >
> > I don't know. But I'm not using an Int64 field. I'm using a regular
> > integer.
> >
> > I'm not saying that you're not doing it right. I'm just pointing out
> > that the way it is done seems to create a problem in copying the
> > value from the property to another variant property.
> >
> > Or assigning the value of a field in a dataset to the value of
> > another field in another dataset.
> >
> > I never presumed to indicate a better way to do it. I'm just
> > pointing this out.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Mauricio Longo
> >
> > --- In IBObjects@egroups.com, "Jason Wharton" <jwharton@i...> wrote:
> > > So how else do I get an Int64 value in a variant?
> > >
> > > Jason Wharton
> > > CPS - Mesa AZ
> > > http://www.ibobjects.com
>
>
>
> eGroups Sponsor
>
>
>