--- In IBObjects@egroups.com, Art Metz <ametz@n...> wrote:

> > If both of the component are reasonably good ..., I would
> > use fibPlus to do my assignment because I don't want to irritate
> > my lecturer with the nag/'welcome' screen.
>
> 1. Run the demo within the IDE
> 2. This guy has a remarkably low irritation threshhold.
> 3. All kidding aside, I'd be interested in your comparison of

FIBPlus

> with IBO. I looked briefly and there was no comparison. IBO is a

diamond

> in the rough; FIBPlus seemed to be an early beta.
>
> (BTW, what's a lecturer? A teacher?)
>
> Art Metz
> AMetz@n...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: kjteng@b... [mailto:kjteng@b...]

My comparison was based on the info available on these websites:
ibobjects.com, second-dream.ru and zeos.dn.ua
The purpose is just to find out which component should
I learn and use. It is not a software testing kind of staff as you
think.
I have also asked for advice in the interbase new group but
did not receive much response.
Anyway, I found IBObject is the most impressive one. (Except that I
don't quite like the nag screen :-)

lecturer = teacher? Something like that. Normally we refer to
those teaching in the primary/secondary school a teacher.

> > Sent: Friday, January 05, 2001 9:15 AM
> > To: IBObjects@egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [IBO] FreeIB+ - now it's comercial !!!
> >
> >
> >
> > If both of the component are reasonably good (stable,
> > reliable and easy to use. OTH if I am using the component to write
> > commercial software, the consideration would be different), I

would

> > use fibPlus to do my assignment because I don't want to irritate

my

> > lecturer with the nag/'welcome' screen.
> >
> > A software without nag screen somehow looks more polished. Don't
> > u think so?
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >