Subject | Re: MySQL DB-->Firebird |
---|---|
Author | David K. |
Post date | 2005-03-28T17:08:43Z |
Hi HELEN,
I an an end user (broadcaster, customer). As you may know SAM,
requires some kind of SQL daatabase to run. I'vve experimented with
FireBird and it works better for me than mysql, so that's why I'd like
to migrate my db to fb. I'll take a look at the link you offered.
Thanks many,
Dave/JE
I an an end user (broadcaster, customer). As you may know SAM,
requires some kind of SQL daatabase to run. I'vve experimented with
FireBird and it works better for me than mysql, so that's why I'd like
to migrate my db to fb. I'll take a look at the link you offered.
Thanks many,
Dave/JE
--- In IB-Conversions@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@t...> wrote:
> At 04:42 AM 28/03/2005 +0000, David K. wrote:
>
> >I'm very new to this and am wondeirng if this is the right place to
> >post and ask.
> >I am using a program called SAM from spacialaudio.com and I would like
> >to completely move away from MYSQL, and use FireBird. How do I import
> >the SAMDB from MySQL into FireBird?
>
> See http://www.clevercomponents.com/products/datapump/dp-tour.asp
>
> Since (as you say) you are very new to this and you don't say where
you are
> standing with respect to the software (end-user? developer?
developer of
> third-party products that use SAM?) then don't look for a miracle. For
> example, migrating data from a database in the *format* used by one
DBMS to
> the *format* used by another is relatively simple, i.e. a way can
usually
> be found to do it.
>
> What may matter more for a DBMS at the back-end of an existing software
> product is the way data is managed. MySQL isn't useful for
client/server
> systems that need bomb-proof control of multiple concurrent read-write
> clients; on the other hand, it is ideal for back-ending software that
> needs load-once, read often data storage. That characteristic might
well
> be why the SAM developer chose MySQL at all...
>
> As a SAM user, there would be a number of essential issues to
understand
> before committing yourself to your plan, including:
>
> 1) Does it need/can it work with concurrency support? If so, do you
have
> the means to manipulate transactions from your user/developer interface?
> 2) Does your software/interface depend on MySQL-specific data types
like
> identity or Boolean?
> 3) Is data integrity tightly bound to application code as, with
MySQL, it
> necessarily is?
> 4) ...and more...
>
> All this is NOT to discourage you from experimenting with Firebird.
Take a
> copy of your MySQL database and just go for it. Even if you end up
with a
> database that your software doesn't like, you will have in your hand
your
> own personal Firebird database on which to cut your DBA teeth. If
we are
> all lucky, you will chronicle your experiences (failures and successes
> alike) and have a HowTo that is sure to give someone else a
much-need leg-up.
>
> Helen