Subject | Re: [firebird-tools] IBReplicator performance |
---|---|
Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
Post date | 2011-04-05T18:45:53Z |
05.04.2011 12:55, mark.ruys wrote:
irrelevant. Throughput mostly depends on hardware and size of replicated records. 100
records per second can be an estimated minimum.
reading documentation).
replicator's stability mainly depends on stability of environment - hardware, OS, drivers,
etc.
--
SY, SD.
> Someone told me that replicating a complete database (15 GB in our case) might take a considerable performance hit. Is this indeed the case?IBPReplicator uses log to replicate changes only, so total size of database is
irrelevant. Throughput mostly depends on hardware and size of replicated records. 100
records per second can be an estimated minimum.
> - is it difficult to set up (I found MySQL replication straightforward)?No. For the simplest master-slave case it takes 15-20 minutes (not counting time for
reading documentation).
> - is it stable (like running for months/years without any intervention)?No proven complaints in support list for last few months. Currently it looks like
replicator's stability mainly depends on stability of environment - hardware, OS, drivers,
etc.
> - is it unwisely to replicate to a off-site remote server w.r.t. performance/stability?No matter. Off-line replication is highly tolerant to communication channel.
--
SY, SD.