| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] What are the trade-offs of CHAR vs. VARCHAR? |
|---|---|
| Author | Dimitry Sibiryakov |
| Post date | 2019-11-13T15:01:02Z |
13.11.2019 15:51, blackfalconsoftware@... [firebird-support] wrote:
with full declared length.
--
WBR, SD.
> However, internally, the CHAR field definition is more efficient as the database does notNo such calculations is performed in Firebird. Both CHAR and VARCHAR are always stored
> have to perform any field size calculations at the moment that data is being updated to a
> VARCHAR field.
with full declared length.
--
WBR, SD.