Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Storing a byte array in Firebird |
---|---|
Author | Mark Rotteveel |
Post date | 2019-10-27T07:05:37Z |
On 27-10-2019 00:25, blackfalconsoftware@... [firebird-support]
wrote:
is what you need.
Storing binary data encoded in base64 will consume 1/3 more bytes than
necessary.
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel
wrote:
> I have found what I needed.There is no need to do that. Type CHAR/VARCHAR with character set OCTETS
>
> Sorry for the bother...
>
> I was having trouble finding a way top convert the array into a string,
> which led me to believe I would have to store it in array format.
>
> I eventually found the correct solution after going through several
> incorrect ones. I couldn't remember that all I needed was to use the
> Base64 conversion...
is what you need.
Storing binary data encoded in base64 will consume 1/3 more bytes than
necessary.
Mark
--
Mark Rotteveel