Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Firebird 3.0 client does not work with remote Firebird 2.5 database |
---|---|
Author | Mark Rotteveel |
Post date | 2019-01-20T19:34:58Z |
On 2019-01-20 14:25, Michael Fox mike@... [firebird-support]
wrote:
this specific problem, but I know there were several issues in the early
clients with authentication.
assume that value for WireCrypt you show was prefixed with #, otherwise
that is an invalid config value (valid values are one of Enable,
Required, Disabled). Although, IIRC, the WireCrypt setting is ignored
when connecting to Firebird 2.5 or earlier.
Also check if there isn't another firebird.conf.
a problem?
Mark
wrote:
> It’s the default package of firebird-dev 3.0.1.32609.ds4-14 onIf possible, upgrade to 3.0.4. I can't identify a ticket that matches
> Stretch which doesn’t work. The previous version of firebird-dev
> 2.5.3.26778.ds4-5+deb8u1 on Jessie works fine with the same
> credentials (note: I’m using PHP’s Interbase extension to connect
> but I don’t think it’s the cause of the issue).
this specific problem, but I know there were several issues in the early
clients with authentication.
> The config settings are the default ones. For the two settings youConfig options prefixed with `#` are comments describing the default. I
> mentioned:
>
> AuthClient = Srp, Win_Sspi, Legacy_Auth
> WireCrypt = Enabled (for client) / Required (for server)
>
> I’ve played around with different permutations without success.
assume that value for WireCrypt you show was prefixed with #, otherwise
that is an invalid config value (valid values are one of Enable,
Required, Disabled). Although, IIRC, the WireCrypt setting is ignored
when connecting to Firebird 2.5 or earlier.
Also check if there isn't another firebird.conf.
> Maybe worth noting that the credentials for the remote server are inThat is a valid connection string. Why do you suspect that this could be
> the format:
>
> XX.XXX.X.XXX/45731:d:/Database/P2Gold data.ib
>
> I don’t know if the space in the filename could be causing it.
> Unfortunately I have no control over the remote server as it’s owned
> by a third party..
a problem?
Mark