Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: firebird 3.0 ten times slower than 2.5 ? |
---|---|
Author | Mark Rotteveel |
Post date | 2017-03-09T09:20:43Z |
On 2017-03-08 11:30, Michal Kurczabinski michkurc@...
[firebird-support] wrote:
one variable. So when comparing Firebird 2.5 and Firebird 3, use Jaybird
2.2 for both (or Jaybird 3 for both). To use Jaybird 2.2 with Firebird 3
you need to enable legacy authentication.
In other words: Jaybird version numbers are not related to Firebird
versions; maybe I should apply the same trick as the PostgreSQL JDBC
team recently applied and use a totally different version number.
If there is a noticeable performance difference between Jaybird 2.2 and
Jaybird 3, I would really appreciate a good reproduction database +
program.
Mark
[firebird-support] wrote:
> Thanks for your answer,When comparing performance of two systems, it is better to only change
>
> perhaps problem is in jaybird-3.0.0-beta-3 used to connection to fb 3.
>
> My fb25 client is jaybird-2.2.12 and works fine.
one variable. So when comparing Firebird 2.5 and Firebird 3, use Jaybird
2.2 for both (or Jaybird 3 for both). To use Jaybird 2.2 with Firebird 3
you need to enable legacy authentication.
In other words: Jaybird version numbers are not related to Firebird
versions; maybe I should apply the same trick as the PostgreSQL JDBC
team recently applied and use a totally different version number.
If there is a noticeable performance difference between Jaybird 2.2 and
Jaybird 3, I would really appreciate a good reproduction database +
program.
Mark