| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Migrating a 2.5 server |
|---|---|
| Author | Lester Caine |
| Post date | 2017-02-07T09:44:28Z |
On 07/02/17 08:14, Luke Crooks luke@...
[firebird-support] wrote:
windows box at each site and eventually progressed to running via a
remote Linux server with local windows clients. Some sites we had
problems with slow connection times, and it was invariably due to the
network configuration. Looking up IP addresses from machine names which
is not something that should be a problem, but switching those sites to
use static IP addresses invariably sorted things out.
But since TA+ seems to be running as a windows client application, it
may be having fun with some of the more recent developments in Windows
OS. So what version of Windows are you running on? I would expect
Safescan to provide updates to cope with the M$ aspects of their product
since they are charging for it ;) My client interfaces moved to web
based 15 odd years ago to remove THAT management problem ... and
Firebird continues to provide a response time in the fractions of a
second on my systems.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk
[firebird-support] wrote:
> When running the 2.5 server on our Windows DC and having clients accessI have a similar sort of legacy product which started life on a local
> from the local network, performance was very slow (almost unusable). We
> are using a safescan product (Time Attendance +) which uses a firebird
> database. So to combat this, I first tried serving the file locally on a
> machine and accessing it this way, no performance issues here.
>
> So I then had the idea that it could be that our windows server has to
> much load already, so I installed firebird on our onsite dedicated SQL
> server (this server is much quicker by comparison, 8 cores, 32GB of ram
> and runs postgres for us with loads of resources to spare). So I
> installed firebird on this SQL server (FreeBSD), configured the software
> to point to the new database, and yet again the performance is awful,
> does anyone have an idea what might be causing such slow speeds when
> connecting to a database locally? I can't see the firewall blocking
> anything and have given full access to port 3050, thanks.
windows box at each site and eventually progressed to running via a
remote Linux server with local windows clients. Some sites we had
problems with slow connection times, and it was invariably due to the
network configuration. Looking up IP addresses from machine names which
is not something that should be a problem, but switching those sites to
use static IP addresses invariably sorted things out.
But since TA+ seems to be running as a windows client application, it
may be having fun with some of the more recent developments in Windows
OS. So what version of Windows are you running on? I would expect
Safescan to provide updates to cope with the M$ aspects of their product
since they are charging for it ;) My client interfaces moved to web
based 15 odd years ago to remove THAT management problem ... and
Firebird continues to provide a response time in the fractions of a
second on my systems.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk
Rainbow Digital Media - http://rainbowdigitalmedia.co.uk