> Hi,
>
> At August 28, 2015, 10:59 AM, Nick Upson nu@...
> <mailto:nu@...>[firebird-support] wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 28 August 2015 at 14:43, Thomas Steinmaurer ts@...
> <mailto:ts@...>[firebird-support]
> <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com>> wrote:
>>http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/fb25_architecture_comparison.pdf
>
> IMHO, this one clearly states that there are 3 architectures in 2.5
> available.
>
> ​superserver & classic not applicable, embedded is sc, and sc itself => 1
>
>
>
> I think that the line that is labeled "Architecture" should probably
> read something else (i.e.: changes in architecture), or at the very
> least repeat its header. But, all 3 architectures (superserver, classic
> and superclassic) are available in FB 2.5, which superclassic is new to
> 2.5. And, embedded was changed from superserver to superclassic
> architecture.

Daniel and Nick, I agree, this is a bit confusing. ;-)

The "architecture" line was for Embedded only, as the (three) columns
for the server edition already is the equally named architecture.



--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com/

Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.