02.07.2015 19:36, 'Leyne, Sean' wrote:

>
>>> Oldest transaction 1
>>> Oldest active 2
>>> Oldest snapshot 2
>>> Next transaction 492
>
> Even it that switch was used, why would the transactions appear to active?

They're not active, the header page is just out-of-date. Transaction
counters are updated when some transaction is started. When nobody is
connected, OAT does not make any sense.


Dmitry