Subject | Re: Maximum Number of Connections 2.5.3 |
---|---|
Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
Post date | 2015-06-02T07:28:42Z |
02.06.2015 03:51, firebirdbestsql@... [firebird-support] wrote:
with a compile-time connection limit. It was hardcoded as 1024 in early
FB versions and as 2048 since v2.5.3.
SuperServer/SuperClassic builds and only for Windows.
this should be doable.
Regardless, there's no connection limit for either Classic Server on
Windows or any FB architecture on Linux/MacOS, so you have a choice.
Dmitry
> There seems to be contradictory information about maximum number ofThat article is a bit incorrect. Some TCP stack implementations operate
> simultaneous distinct user connections to Firebird. This document:
>
> How many users can connect to Firebird simultaneously?
> <http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq292/> says there is not limit, except for
> the TCP/IP in the OS.
with a compile-time connection limit. It was hardcoded as 1024 in early
FB versions and as 2048 since v2.5.3.
> However, on the download page of the Firebird home, it clearly lists theYes, this limit was extended. But it was actual only for
> max number as fixed at : 2048
SuperServer/SuperClassic builds and only for Windows.
> My app is stateful, must remain open for up to eight hours, and eachI don't see any serious issues speaking against the connection pooling,
> user is distinct, so connection pooling is probably not the answer.
> (Each individual user&# 39;s connection must be kept separate from each
> other). I need to serve 7,000 users. Should I forget about using
> Firebird for this app, and move to MS SQL Server?
this should be doable.
Regardless, there's no connection limit for either Classic Server on
Windows or any FB architecture on Linux/MacOS, so you have a choice.
Dmitry