> ---In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, <ts@...> wrote :
>
>> From a throughput perspective, this would mean:
> >
>> IB XE3 => 0,918 MB/s
>> IB XE7 => 1,896 MB/s
>> FB 3 => 3,282 MB/s
> >
>> To be honest, astonishing low numbers in 2015, for all three.
>
> To be even more honest, measure time of restore without building indices and
> non-table metadata objects. Else your statement is about nothing, sorry

Ehm, just did some math on Karol's results. ;-)

And I guess his numbers present the entire restore time or did I miss something?

> Regards,
> Vlad
>
> PS I don't say Firebird is able to restore at full speed of HDD sequential
> write, but your
> conclusion is very far from truth. IMHO, of course.

Well, I haven't said that a Firebird restore is that slow in GENERAL as shown with the numbers above. It is in Karol's environment.


--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com

Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.