Subject Re: [firebird-support] High CPU use after restore
Author Jardar Maatje
Hi

First of all thanks for help on the way. After a lot of work (and waiting for restore,backups indexing...) I found out that it actually was as simple as an index that was inactive. The index must have been disabled during my first backup/restore as I am sure I did not do this myself.
The index was a normal foreign key. However the table included a blob column.

Anyone that has an idea why this was disable during backup/restore?

Anyway one the results of this is that I know both have better understanding of firebird and also have better tools for dealing with situations where I need to take down the database.

Best regards

Jardar

On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Helen Borrie helebor@... [firebird-support] <firebird-support@yahoogroups.com> wrote:
 

Hello Jardar,

Thursday, October 29, 2015, 9:55:20 PM, you wrote:




The comment about "at least rebuild indexes" does that mean that I can expect this to work or do I risk that I still need to backup/restore?


A restore will rebuild all of the indexes.  However, the indexes affected by the v.2.5.1 bug are those that are compound, i.e., multi-column, so they are the only ones you need to rebuild.  A backup/restore will not be required.  

If you have multi-column primary, foreign or unique key constraints, note that ALTER INDEX <index-name> INACTIVE will not work on a constraint index;  but ALTER INDEX <index-name> ACTIVE will rebuild those anyway.

Do I need to say, do this job whilst you have exclusive access as an administrator of the database or as the owner of the affected tables.

Helen




--
Jardar Maatje
Nortek Data Services AS
C.J. Hambros Plass 2C
0164 Oslo
tlf: +47 95184034