Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Data Type for Primary Key |
---|---|
Author | Thomas Steinmaurer |
Post date | 2015-10-07T06:16:13Z |
Kevin Meyers kevinjmeyers@... [firebird-support] schrieb am 06.10.2015 22:36:
You will for sure have different areas where you can improve performance. The root cause for 90% of performance issues are usually SQL Tuning/Performance and the unterlaying physical data model (indexes etc.) related.
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.
> I am wondering if any of you have every noticed any significant performanceBIGINT is the way to go.
> difference between using BIGINT versus INTEGER as an autoincremented
> primary key in Firebird. My idea is to use BIGINT and have virtually
> unlimited records ("set it and forget it" approach), but if I am going to
> incur a real performance hit, I would probably use INTEGER instead. I've
> done some modest testing and haven't noticed much difference, but I am
> wondering what you all have experienced in real world situations.
You will for sure have different areas where you can improve performance. The root cause for 90% of performance issues are usually SQL Tuning/Performance and the unterlaying physical data model (indexes etc.) related.
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.