Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Is there any benefit when using Firebird Classic in 64bit version? |
---|---|
Author | Thomas Steinmaurer |
Post date | 2014-04-18T13:07:31Z |
> First of all Thomas, thank you very much for your response.In general, they are wrong. ;-)
> As I am sure you know there is this 64 bit hype around and people will
> install 64 bit versions of applications just because 64 number is bigger
> than 32 = they think that bigger means better.
> But I have my own brain and thought that there is no point forHigh RAM utilization doesn't necessary result in best performance.
> installing 64 bit server if single firebird process takes no more than
> 20 MB of RAM.
>
> > I guess you are running with the default 75 page buffers, as well with
> > low in-memory sort settings etc. A great playground for Firebird
> > consulting services. ;-)
>
> Good guess! :-) However I am planning to change that, please take a look
> if you do not mind and this post:
> https://groups.yahoo.com/neo/groups/firebird-support/conversations/messages/124144
>
> Noone has responded me, perhaps for the reason you said - it is a good
> job for a consultant. And noone want to give such advice for free...
>
> However it is hard for me to imagine the set of options in firebird
> config which would cause a single process to take 2GB of RAM.
Usually, already with some conservative base optimization regarding
various Firebird configuration settings, one can achieve good results.
Once you have a base/good Firebird configuration, from my experience,
SQL performance tuning is the most promising and important area to look at.
> > But when you are using third-party UDF libraries, they usually add aPlease contact me offline, if you are *seriously* interested.
> > dependency on the bitness for the Firebird server anyway. I have seen
> > customers using their home-grown UDF library built with Delphi, thus
> > 32-bit in the old days, which results in using Firebird 32-bit as well.
>
> > You can't use Firebird 64-bit when you are using a 32-bit UDF library
> > and don't have a 64-bit version of the UDF library available. But I
> > guess, you know that.
>
> Yes I know that, I wrote 32 bit UDF and now I am starting to think about
> recompiling it with 64 bit. The reason is that guys from my company are
> installing 64 bit FB in Classic because they think it is better...
>
> Thomas,
>
> how much would you take for an one hour of your consulting time?:)
> Could you send me some offer on my email?
--
With regards,
Thomas Steinmaurer
http://www.upscene.com/
Professional Tools and Services for Firebird
FB TraceManager, IB LogManager, Database Health Check, Tuning etc.