Subject | Re: Deadlock exception occurs but it shouldn't? |
---|---|
Author | |
Post date | 2014-12-24T14:39:12Z |
Thank you Hugo, I was bit reluctant to use WITH LOCK since documentation discourages its usage.
I've tried it but it did not help.
Documentation says:
"The main purposes of explicit locks are (1) to prevent expensive handling of update conflict errors in heavily loaded application"
this is the exact reason I try to avoid conflicts. My threads can wait but they should not raise exceptions.
I always though that it is possible to avoid such conflicts on the database level.
I've tried it but it did not help.
Documentation says:
"The main purposes of explicit locks are (1) to prevent expensive handling of update conflict errors in heavily loaded application"
this is the exact reason I try to avoid conflicts. My threads can wait but they should not raise exceptions.
I always though that it is possible to avoid such conflicts on the database level.