Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Classic vs Superserver |
---|---|
Author | Leyne, Sean |
Post date | 2013-08-29T15:09:13Z |
> > (3) Do these motivations make sense?In re-reading my post, I realize that the above is not as technically correct as it should be. I should have written:
>
> Yes and no. ;-]
>
> Classic does not provide the fastest performance, but it does provide the
> most consistent multi-connection performance. It is currently (v3 will be
> changing this) the only engine which truly scales across CPUs.
Classic does not provide the fastest performance, but it does provide the most consistent multi-connection performance. It is currently (v3 will be changing this) the only engine which is able to use multi-cores/CPU to support multiple database connections*
Sean
* Each connection is a dedicated OS process, which the OS is able to move to free CPU resource has the load increases.