Subject | Re: [firebird-support] singleton table with many fields |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2013-07-16T04:13:31Z |
Em 16/7/2013 00:03, thp_pkmi escreveu:
I think you will have a dozen or so records.. that will fit in a single
page...
Since every operation will read/write a page...
see you !
> Hi all,I doubt it will make any diference...
>
> I have a table that always contains 1 record and have about 50 fields with various type. It's function is to store system parameters and is accessed very frequent from application and also from database triggers and stored procedures. Is it wise to utilize a singleton table like this, or is it better to implement a table with many records storing parameter name, type, and values ?
>
> Thank you very much.
>
> Regards,
> Tjioe
>
I think you will have a dozen or so records.. that will fit in a single
page...
Since every operation will read/write a page...
see you !