Hi Helen,

Many thanks for clarifying..

Geoff

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, Helen Borrie <helebor@...> wrote:
>
> At 11:23 p.m. 16/06/2013, you wrote:
> >Hi,
> >
> >I'm considering using Firebird for my database applications.
> >
> >My applications are not large and certainly cater for (usually!) around 10 users on a LAN.
> >
> >I use a single database and it is usually accessed by users their own individual instances of my application.
> >
> >Can I use Firebird Embedded for this, or should I use the full client server version? If the full client/server, which version Classic, SuperClassic or Superserver?
>
> Well, the beautiful thing is, you don't have to decide that until you have a real environment to deploy to. These are not "different versions" of Firebird but different execution models of the same database engine, that allow you to deploy the same software to sites varying from a single user in an attic to thousands of users in an enterprise in the way that best suits your data volume, hardware resources and network availability.
>
> With "10 users on a LAN" it doesn't make any sense to consider deploying 10 stand-alone installations - unless, for some absurd reason, every employee has to maintain his or her own database. That sounds like a management nightmare.
>
> Firebird is designed to make one database accessible to everyone on a network, as clients. Embedded is good when you have one and only one client: the "attic" user or as the back-end to a managed client layer such as a web-application. For two or more clients, you're looking at a client/server deployment.
>
>
> Helen Borrie, Support Consultant, IBPhoenix (Pacific)
> Author of "The Firebird Book" and "The Firebird Book Second Edition"
> http://www.firebird-books.net
> __________________________________________________________________
>