Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Rename database command |
---|---|
Author | Alexandre Benson Smith |
Post date | 2013-06-06T23:51:35Z |
Em 6/6/2013 19:45, sir_wally_lewis escreveu:
go deep into firebird...
So, if my advices was useless forgive me for taking your time...
And I can't see a reason why a 32bit integer value of 100 is processed
faster then a 32bit integer 2.123.456.789.. anyway.... As you said you
have confidence thos fact.. I think you reaaly need a way to rename a
back-up... maybe you could sponsor such feature...
wish you luck...
see you !
> Hi,I am not assuming you are newbie... but *you* said you don't intend to
>
> Please do not misunderstand me. I already have gone over this ground. I am not a newbie when it comes to firebird. In fact I have worked major miracles in making with firebird to do what it does now.
>
> There are no long running transactions.
>
> Your assuming my code is the source of the issue, is fascinating to me. It is a large "Jump to conclusion". Maybe it should be on the "Jump to conclusion mat", that was a joke for anyone who saw "Office space" the movie.
>
> I will attempt to get my DBA to actually gather some physical evidence for this situation.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Robert.
>
>
go deep into firebird...
So, if my advices was useless forgive me for taking your time...
And I can't see a reason why a 32bit integer value of 100 is processed
faster then a 32bit integer 2.123.456.789.. anyway.... As you said you
have confidence thos fact.. I think you reaaly need a way to rename a
back-up... maybe you could sponsor such feature...
wish you luck...
see you !