Since when is necesary to recompile?
Plans are not stored in the SP, the are calculated first time you use, after a connection

May be necessary to disconnect and reconnect, but i doubt i need to recompile all my procedures to use new index.

At least I read this ages ago, about the core of firebird.
Or it's not?

--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, fabianoaspro@... wrote:
>
> If you use this code inside a SP you must recompile it for using this new
> index.
> Also is a good task to recompute the selectivity of the others indexes.
> Sorry my bad english.
> Em 16/04/2013 10:40, "skander_sp" <skander_sp@...> escreveu:
>
> > **
> >
> >
> > Tks!
> > This is a good solution... (and my first try)
> > But don't work, still read the whole table for the yearorden given.
> >
> > I found a couple of "unoptimized" black-point in my application.
> > And what it looks to be nice and wick became an pain in the ass.
> >
> > --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, fabianoaspro@ wrote:
> > >
> > > Create a descending index with yearorden and norden in this sequence.
> > Thats
> > > it.
> > > Em 16/04/2013 04:57, "skander_sp" <skander_sp@> escreveu:
> > >
> > > > **
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Easy (and usual case)
> > > >
> > > > Simple table
> > > >
> > > > CREATE TABLE ORDENES (
> > > > ID_ORDEN INTEGER NOT NULL /* Primary key - GenId */
> > > > YEAR_ORDEN INTEGER NOT NULL /* Year of Orden */,
> > > > N_ORDEN INTEGER NOT NULL /* Order in the Year */,
> > > > ... /* no matter */
> > > > );
> > > >
> > > > ALTER TABLE ORDENES ADD CONSTRAINT UK_ORDENES UNIQUE (YEAR_ORDEN,
> > > > N_ORDEN)USING DESCENDING INDEX UK_ORDENES_YEAR_N_ORDEN;
> > > >
> > > > Now I need to access in the insert trigger, for next order to be
> > assigned
> > > > to N_ORDEN in the YEAR_ORDEN using
> > > >
> > > > select coalesce(max(o.n_orden),0)+1
> > > > from ordenes o
> > > > where o.year_orden=new.year_orden
> > > > into new.n_orden
> > > >
> > > > IT WORK!!!! nice, BUT NOT OPTIMIZED, in the Performance Analisys it
> > read
> > > > (indexed) all the N_ORDEN in the table, not going to the first (given
> > the
> > > > descending order of the index)
> > > >
> > > > How can optimize the index/query?
> > > > Or simply is not possible doing more?
> > > >
> > > > Tks in advance
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>