Subject | Re: [firebird-support] (unknown) |
---|---|
Author | Gary Benade |
Post date | 2012-07-12T11:10:22Z |
On 7/11/2012 9:48 PM, Alexandre Benson Smith wrote:
your query to this:
select first 20 * from LISTA_CLIENTES where (CLIENTE like 'crist%' or
MORADA like 'crist%' or LOCALIDADE like 'crist%' or CLIENTE like
'crist%' or PAIS like 'crist%' or PAIS_NOME like 'crist%' or TELEFONE
like 'crist%' or EMAIL like 'crist%' or CONTRIBUINTE like 'crist%' or
COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO like 'crist%') order by CLIENTE
like 'search%' allows firebird to use an index, and most people will
type the first letters of a name or telephone number to search, not
random letters in the middle of the name
Regards
Gary
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>If you have indexes on any or all of the search columns, you can change
> Em 11/7/2012 14:23, K Z escreveu:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm still far from a expert on firebird and sql. If someone can help
> me to improve this code, i will be grateful.
> >
> > 1) GOAL: I need to make a search for a partial word in several
> fields of the customers table.
> >
> > 2) STRUCTURE: I am using a view because i join the customers table
> with the country names table and payment conditions table.
> >
> >
> > CREATE TABLE CLIENTES
> > (
> > IDCLIENTES INTEGER NOT NULL,
> > CLIENTE VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > MORADA VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CP VARCHAR(10) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > LOCALIDADE VARCHAR(50) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > PAIS VARCHAR(2) DEFAULT 'PT' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > TELEFONE VARCHAR(15) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > FAX VARCHAR(15) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE
> > UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > EMAIL VARCHAR(100) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO SMALLINT DEFAULT 1 NOT NULL,
> > REGIME_IVA VARCHAR(1) DEFAULT 'G' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > PER_DESCONTO DECIMAL(6,2) DEFAULT 0 NOT NULL,
> > NUNCA_BLOQUEAR VARCHAR(1) DEFAULT 'F' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CONTRIBUINTE VARCHAR(25) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > COD_CLIENTE_FAT VARCHAR(15) DEFAULT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > ATIVO VARCHAR(1) DEFAULT 'T' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > VALIDADO VARCHAR(1) DEFAULT 'F' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CONSTRAINT INTEG_26 PRIMARY KEY (IDCLIENTES)
> > );
> >
> > CREATE INDEX IDX_CLIENTES1 ON CLIENTES (CLIENTE);
> > CREATE INDEX IDX_CLIENTES2 ON CLIENTES (PAIS);
> > CREATE INDEX IDX_CLIENTES3 ON CLIENTES (CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO);
> >
> > CREATE TABLE COND_PAGAMENTO
> > (
> > IDCOND_PAGAMENTO INTEGER NOT NULL,
> > DESCRICAO VARCHAR(45) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > QTD_DIAS
> > SMALLINT DEFAULT 0,
> > ENTREGA_PAGAMENTO VARCHAR(1) DEFAULT 'T' NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CONSTRAINT INTEG_14 PRIMARY KEY (IDCOND_PAGAMENTO)
> > );
> >
> > CREATE TABLE PAISES
> > (
> > IDPAISES INTEGER NOT NULL,
> > NOME VARCHAR(60) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > CODIGO_ISO_3166_1 VARCHAR(2) NOT NULL COLLATE UNICODE_CI_AI,
> > VALOR_PORTES DECIMAL(10,2) DEFAULT NULL,
> > ISENCAO_PORTES DECIMAL(10,2) DEFAULT NULL,
> > CONSTRAINT INTEG_79 PRIMARY KEY (IDPAISES)
> > );
> >
> > CREATE VIEW LISTA_CLIENTES (COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO, PAIS_NOME,
> IDCLIENTES, CLIENTE, MORADA, CP, LOCALIDADE, PAIS, TELEFONE, FAX,
> EMAIL, CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO, REGIME_IVA, PER_DESCONTO, NUNCA_BLOQUEAR,
> CONTRIBUINTE, COD_CLIENTE_FAT, ATIVO, VALIDADO)
> > AS
> > select cp.DESCRICAO COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO,p.NOME PAIS_NOME,c.*
> > FROM CLIENTES c
> > inner join PAISES p on p.CODIGO_ISO_3166_1=c.PAIS
> > inner join COND_PAGAMENTO cp on
> > cp.IDCOND_PAGAMENTO=c.CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO
> > order by c.CLIENTE;
> >
> >
> > 3) THE SLOW QUERY: From Flamerobin i run the following query and is
> take 60 seconds to finished:
> >
> > select first 20 * from LISTA_CLIENTES where (CLIENTE like '%crist%'
> or MORADA like '%crist%' or LOCALIDADE like '%crist%' or CLIENTE like
> '%crist%' or PAIS like '%crist%' or PAIS_NOME like '%crist%' or
> TELEFONE like '%crist%' or EMAIL like '%crist%' or CONTRIBUINTE like
> '%crist%' or COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO like '%crist%') order by CLIENTE
> >
> > If i change the query to:
> >
> > select first 20 * from LISTA_CLIENTES where (CLIENTE like '%crist%')
> order by CLIENTE
> >
> > it runs much faster. But as more fields i had in the WHERE clause,
> more slow it gets. I try using the CONTAINING function instead of LIKE
> but i got no improvement. I also tried to create a PROCEDURE to speed
> up but again not speed up on getting the result.
> >
> > I use this kind of code with other tables and
> > it runs very fast. I also tried using MySQL for comparing and this
> exact query runs in milliseconds. I tried to read docs in the Firebird
> site and still no improvements.
> > Can anyone help me with this problem?
> >
> > Thank you.
> >
> >
>
> This kind of search criteria (like '%crist%') will not use an index, so
> the size of the tables would impact on the time to get the records. I
> think that if you just filter using CLIENTE like '%crist%' is faster
> because it starts by this table, but when you put the fields from the
> other tables the optimizer thinks that will be faster to start from
> table PAIS for example, and thus the final result is slow. There is no
> way to make this kind of query to be fast, it simply cannot use any
> index to speed it up and worse sicne you are searching for the same
> information on fields from a bunch of tables the optimizer will choose
> very bad plans because it will start from the table with fewer rows even
> when the data is in fact on the larger table. CONTAINING will no help as
> you already experienced and the stored procedure will not help either...
>
> You could "fool" the optimizer forcing the table CLIENTES to be the
> first one scanned using a query like:
>
> CREATE VIEW LISTA_CLIENTES (COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO, PAIS_NOME,
> IDCLIENTES, CLIENTE, MORADA, CP, LOCALIDADE, PAIS, TELEFONE, FAX,
> EMAIL, CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO, REGIME_IVA, PER_DESCONTO, NUNCA_BLOQUEAR,
> CONTRIBUINTE, COD_CLIENTE_FAT, ATIVO, VALIDADO)
> AS
> select cp.DESCRICAO COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO,p.NOME PAIS_NOME,c.*
> FROM CLIENTES c
> left join PAISES p on p.CODIGO_ISO_3166_1=c.PAIS
> inner join COND_PAGAMENTO cp on
> cp.IDCOND_PAGAMENTO=c.CONDICOES_PAGAMENTO
> order by c.CLIENTE;
>
> *But* it will be slower if the real searched data resides on table PAIS...
>
> I use a diferent approach to help the user to search for records, first
> the user point wich field it wants to search (for example the Name) then
> I do a search in 3 steps:
> 1.) search for the exact name:
> Select * from Lista_Clientes where Cliente = 'something'
>
> if I find just one record, I will return this value, if there is more
> than one I would present a grid, so the user could choose from the
> available records, if there is no record I will go to step 2
>
> 2.) search for the beginning
>
> Select * from Lista_Clientes where Cliente like 'something%'
>
> if I find just one record, I will return this value, if there is more
> than one I would present a grid, so the user could choose from the
> available records, if there is no record I will go to step 3
>
> 3.) sarch for the string in anywhere in the specified field
> Select * from Lista_Clientes where Cliente like '%something%'
>
> if I find just one record, I will return this value, if there is more
> than one I would present a grid, so the user could choose from the
> available records, if there is no record the user can try another search
>
> The step 1 and 2 are really fast no matter what the size of the table
> because it will use an index on the field, step 3 will be slow since no
> index could be used, but in the vast majority of the cases step 1 and 2
> will return the desired records, step 3 will not be executed very often.
> As an aditional feature user could put wildcards on the searched string,
> if the search string contains any wildcard the step 1 is bypassed and if
> the first character of the string is an wildcard the routine would
> bypass step 1 and 2 and go directly for step 3.
>
> I know that what you are trying to achieve is friendly to the user, he
> just throw some data and the system tries to find it anywhere, but it
> will not be fast. IMHO you should think about the general case, how
> often the user want to find a costumer by a string but don't know if
> that string is a name or a country or a phone number ??? how much bogus
> information will it return ? (ex. costumers who has that piece of the
> string on the street address and the user are searching for the name of
> the company), I think it will return a lot of uninteresting information.
>
> see you
>
your query to this:
select first 20 * from LISTA_CLIENTES where (CLIENTE like 'crist%' or
MORADA like 'crist%' or LOCALIDADE like 'crist%' or CLIENTE like
'crist%' or PAIS like 'crist%' or PAIS_NOME like 'crist%' or TELEFONE
like 'crist%' or EMAIL like 'crist%' or CONTRIBUINTE like 'crist%' or
COND_PAGAMENTO_DESCRICAO like 'crist%') order by CLIENTE
like 'search%' allows firebird to use an index, and most people will
type the first letters of a name or telephone number to search, not
random letters in the middle of the name
Regards
Gary
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]