| Subject | Re: Restoring backup from 2.5 to 2.1 |
|---|---|
| Author | Dmitry Yemanov |
| Post date | 2012-07-05T08:26:16Z |
04.07.2012 22:11, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
unavoidable either. v2.5 names security classes in a way that prior
versions don't accept.
Dmitry
>This is v2.5 specific. It was not intended, but it looks being
> Has this changed for the combination 2.1/2.5? AFAIK people successfully
> did that with 2.0/2.1?
unavoidable either. v2.5 names security classes in a way that prior
versions don't accept.
Dmitry