Subject Re: Restoring backup from 2.5 to 2.1
Author Dmitry Yemanov
04.07.2012 22:11, Thomas Steinmaurer wrote:
> Has this changed for the combination 2.1/2.5? AFAIK people successfully
> did that with 2.0/2.1?

This is v2.5 specific. It was not intended, but it looks being
unavoidable either. v2.5 names security classes in a way that prior
versions don't accept.