Subject | Re: Restore problem |
---|---|
Author | Aage Johansen |
Post date | 2012-04-16T18:22:17Z |
Dmitry Kuzmenko wrote:
<<
if you run same command line for the same DB, i.e.
backup/restore, backup/restore, etc, than you killed metadata in it.
sites involved.
1.
Site A is running Fb/1.5. A backup is made nightly from a database.
2.
At irregular intervals last night's backup is transferred (ftp) to
site B - my pc.
3.
My pc is running Fb/2.5. I restore the backup here (site B) using
the parameters shown. The restore always overwrites the current
database (otherwise I rename it before restore).
4.
This backup is _never_ returned to site A. It is just used (on site
B) for test/development.
5.
The original database (at site A) is updated by some other users. I
do sometimes update the metadata of the database at site A.
--
Aage J.
<<
if you run same command line for the same DB, i.e.
backup/restore, backup/restore, etc, than you killed metadata in it.
>>I think we are facing a major misunderstanding. Note, there are 2
sites involved.
1.
Site A is running Fb/1.5. A backup is made nightly from a database.
2.
At irregular intervals last night's backup is transferred (ftp) to
site B - my pc.
3.
My pc is running Fb/2.5. I restore the backup here (site B) using
the parameters shown. The restore always overwrites the current
database (otherwise I rename it before restore).
4.
This backup is _never_ returned to site A. It is just used (on site
B) for test/development.
5.
The original database (at site A) is updated by some other users. I
do sometimes update the metadata of the database at site A.
--
Aage J.