Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Securities |
---|---|
Author | Mark Rotteveel |
Post date | 2012-03-07T10:20:50Z |
On Wed, 7 Mar 2012 12:04:34 +0200, Nols Smit <nols@...>
wrote:
wrong, but if no rights are granted to the trigger, then the caller
permission is used.
Mark
wrote:
> If a user logon under role named Role2, then the trigger of TABLE1forces
> me to give Role2 full access totable's
> Category_ID and RegistrationDate. My intention was may only update
> MemAddress in TABLE1.
>
> Generally speaking: It seems a role must have all privileges on a
> fields used in the table's triggersDid you grant the necessary rights to the trigger itself? I might be
>
>
> Will anyone clarify this confusing security issue?
wrong, but if no rights are granted to the trigger, then the caller
permission is used.
Mark