Subject | Re: [firebird-support] How would Firebird handle this. |
---|---|
Author | Werner F. Bruhin |
Post date | 2012-12-27T11:12:28Z |
On 27/12/2012 02:12, Andrew Gable wrote:
(embedded) but working on a project where this could be an issue for me too.
So, followed Leonardo's advice, but added a word ;-) - i.e. googling on
"transaction isolation levels firebird" gives quite a few good links.
Just a few I found interesting:
http://www.firebirdsql.org/manual/isql-transactions.html
http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-acid.html
http://ibexpert.net/ibe/index.php?n=Doc.TransactionOptionsExplained
Werner
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>Wanted to read up on this again, currently use FB in single user mode
> Hello everyone,
>
> Just a quick question. I have 5 font end terminals connected to a
> firebird 2.1 server
> how would it handle say all the front end apps updating the same record
>
> eg a item 1001 is sold on the front ends and when the transaction is
> done the front ends find the product and does current stock -1 and
> then does a update on the record to save the new stock level into the
> database
>
> is this fine or is there something better I can do so the records do
> not get corrupted
>
> thanks (I know it is a daft question but I've never had more then 2
> machines on the server)
>
(embedded) but working on a project where this could be an issue for me too.
So, followed Leonardo's advice, but added a word ;-) - i.e. googling on
"transaction isolation levels firebird" gives quite a few good links.
Just a few I found interesting:
http://www.firebirdsql.org/manual/isql-transactions.html
http://www.firebirdsql.org/file/documentation/papers_presentations/html/paper-fbent-acid.html
http://ibexpert.net/ibe/index.php?n=Doc.TransactionOptionsExplained
Werner
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]