Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Newbies queries on type of data files and recovery options |
---|---|
Author | Ann Harrison |
Post date | 2011-09-28T15:52:01Z |
Hi Rohit,
bigger than disks. Even the multiple-file configuration mixes tables,
indexes, metadata, and structural data within the file.
corrupt. It can happen if there are memory or disk errors, and the
occasional bug. The last one that happened with regularity could be fixed by
rebuilding an index. Norman has already provided lots of pointers to
documentation on various backup options.
Other files that you need to backup include any UDF libraries you use or
create, the configuration file, and the security database.
Ann
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> I am a SQL Server and MySQL developer. ]'welcome!
>Single file. The multiple file structure was invented when databases were
> 1. Which is the recommended data file structure: `Single file` or
> `Multiple files`?
>
bigger than disks. Even the multiple-file configuration mixes tables,
indexes, metadata, and structural data within the file.
>I think it's 32K * the page size. Huge.
> 2. What is the table and data file max-size for version 2.5?
>
>Fortunately, there are no common scenarios of a Firebird database getting
> 3. What are the common scenarios of a Firebird data file getting corrupt?
> In case of a single-file structure, I guess no other files need to be backed
> up
corrupt. It can happen if there are memory or disk errors, and the
occasional bug. The last one that happened with regularity could be fixed by
rebuilding an index. Norman has already provided lots of pointers to
documentation on various backup options.
Other files that you need to backup include any UDF libraries you use or
create, the configuration file, and the security database.
>Good luck,
Ann
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]