Subject | Re: is "UPDATE or INSERT" the best way to replicate a read-only local table ever? |
---|---|
Author | emb_blaster |
Post date | 2011-07-01T21:05:30Z |
> If you give more specifics as to the development environment (Delphi,Hi Gordon,
> C++, VB, etc), complexity of your database (5 tables, 20, 100, etc), and
> other factors, you may get some advice on tool sets that can support the
> ditributed data environment. Firebird-tools is another good place to
> ask, or to search on old messages.
>
> --
> Thanks,
>
> Gordon
>
Thank you for your response.
We are not looking for tools to do a distributed data environment. It is more simply than that. Just one local table that is updated with one server table data. The rest of the database are not important to this feature.
Changes in server, replicate in local via events or when client application start. There will not be changes in local except server changed first.
We are using Delphi but are discussing the best idea to do this, and not a specific implementation in an language.