Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Why firebird isn't popular on the web? |
---|---|
Author | Milan Babuskov |
Post date | 2011-05-25T15:33:14Z |
Ahmet Nuri D wrote:
with MySQL storage engines with similar features. In the end, it depends
whether you need the speed or robustness/stability. Both MySQL and
Firebird have it's use.
The part saying it crashes is nonsense. I've seen much more MySQL
crashes that Firebird ones, and I use Firebird for 90% of my projects.
http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq54
Regards,
--
Milan Babuskov
==================================
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==================================
> very slow on the net and sometimes it is crashIt is slower than MyISAM, but you get ACID in return. It performs on par
with MySQL storage engines with similar features. In the end, it depends
whether you need the speed or robustness/stability. Both MySQL and
Firebird have it's use.
The part saying it crashes is nonsense. I've seen much more MySQL
crashes that Firebird ones, and I use Firebird for 90% of my projects.
> Why firebird is not populer on the net like Mysql or PostgreSql?Here's why:
http://www.firebirdfaq.org/faq54
Regards,
--
Milan Babuskov
==================================
The easiest way to import XML, CSV
and textual files into Firebird:
http://www.guacosoft.com/xmlwizard
==================================