| Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Firebird 2.5 SuperClassic on Linux 64 -OS memory allocation problem |
|---|---|
| Author | Philippe Makowski |
| Post date | 2011-02-24T16:26:11Z |
2011/2/24 Anderson Farias <peixedragao@...>
Firebird 2.1 and Centos 5 is a good choice (the tracker for example is
Centos 5 and Firebird 2.1)
and Centos 5 have Firebird 2.1 in EPEL repository
>because Centos 5 have glibc < 2.7
> |Centos 5 is not a good plateform for Firebird 2.5 Classic or SuperClassic
>
> And why is that?
> Does this statement also applies to FB 2.1?no, absolutely not
Firebird 2.1 and Centos 5 is a good choice (the tracker for example is
Centos 5 and Firebird 2.1)
and Centos 5 have Firebird 2.1 in EPEL repository