Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Best raid configuration |
---|---|
Author | Vander Clock Stephane |
Post date | 2011-12-27T08:12:39Z |
for what i see here
http://www.kendalvandyke.com/2009/02/disk-performance-hands-on-part-5-raid.html
Generally speaking, it's common knowledge that RAID 5 offers better read
performance while RAID 10 offers better write performance
RAID 5:
10% more faster in read than raid 10
!! 65% !! more slower in write than raid 10 !
http://www.kendalvandyke.com/2009/02/disk-performance-hands-on-part-5-raid.html
Generally speaking, it's common knowledge that RAID 5 offers better read
performance while RAID 10 offers better write performance
RAID 5:
10% more faster in read than raid 10
!! 65% !! more slower in write than raid 10 !
On 12/27/2011 6:30 AM, trskopo wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Someone in this forum said that raid 5 is bad for firebird server.
>
> Regards,
> Sugiarto
>
> --- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com>, "Ismael L. Donis Garcia"
> <ismael@...> wrote:
> >
> > For my understanding I raid 5 or raid 0
> >
> > Best Regards
> > =========
> > || ISMAEL ||
> > =========
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Vander Clock Stephane
> > To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
> <mailto:firebird-support%40yahoogroups.com>
> > Sent: Monday, December 26, 2011 12:37 PM
> > Subject: [firebird-support] Best raid configuration
> >
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > i need to setup a new fb server with 7 sas hard drive
> > With best configuration i can choose ? raid 0, raid 5, raid 6? etc ...
> >
> > thanks by advance
> > stéphane
> >
>
>
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]