Subject | SV: [firebird-support] Firebird classic vs supperclassic |
---|---|
Author | Poul Dige |
Post date | 2011-12-21T12:18:37Z |
The specific setup is for ~150 hosted databases running 24x7 (probably we will change our server hardware before we reach 365 weeks). The databases are quite small ranging from 5-100MB, each DB has between 1-40 connections, but a typical picture will be around 50-100 connections for the whole server. We have no worries, though, about more connections, except that the 2.5.0 can't handle more than 500 connections at a time (this issue was corrected in 2.5.1).
I hope it helps!
Kind regards
Poul
PS. We have another server (Win 2008R2 64), running FB2.5 64 bit SC against one single 5GB DB with around 100 simultanious connections and many thousands connects/disconnects during the day as it serves a web site. Works like a charm, too.
Fra: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af Jesus Garcia
Sendt: 20. december 2011 19:44
Til: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: [firebird-support] Firebird classic vs supperclassic
Best wishes, Jesús
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
I hope it helps!
Kind regards
Poul
PS. We have another server (Win 2008R2 64), running FB2.5 64 bit SC against one single 5GB DB with around 100 simultanious connections and many thousands connects/disconnects during the day as it serves a web site. Works like a charm, too.
Fra: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com [mailto:firebird-support@yahoogroups.com] På vegne af Jesus Garcia
Sendt: 20. december 2011 19:44
Til: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Emne: Re: [firebird-support] Firebird classic vs supperclassic
>How many concurrent users? What database size? 24x7x365?
> We are running the x64 version of FB2.5.0 SC on ubuntu 11.04 server for
> almost a year and we are indeed happy. So far we didn't experience anything
> else but e.g. much faster connection time, compared to 2.1 CS.
>
Best wishes, Jesús
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]