2011/11/23 Lester Caine <lester@...>

>
>
>
> grip_2ls wrote:
> > Thanks for that, in which case the output is the following:
> >
> > /dev/cciss/c0d0p1 536G 135G 402G 26% /
> >
> > so not on the ntfs but the xfs partition. So I don't think that we can blame ntfs in this instance.
> >
> > xfs ok for Firebird?
>
> Should not be a problem, but what IS on the ntfs partition? It's not just the
> database, but the log files, temp files and things like that which could be
> slowing things down. Some of the files may be stored there.

xfs can work ok
but I aggree with Lester, temp files matter too

see http://www.ibphoenix.com/resources/documents/search/doc_26
a lot of settings can have influence
and read also
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=4EC4E976.10606%40firebird-fr.eu.org&forum_name=firebird-devel