Subject | Re: FB2.5 crash |
---|---|
Author | svanderclock |
Post date | 2010-04-11T14:27:36Z |
i forget to say that i firebird n super classic mode.
yes, all use the same charset (ISO8859_1) but we store all the string in UTF8 inside the database...
about the server ram, actually it is 18 GO Used of 32 Go. the fb_inet_server.exe have a private working set of 250 mo and around 30 threads.
do you thing i must play with this params in the firebird.conf :
# ----------------------------
# Locking and shared memory parameters
#
# Bytes of shared memory allocated for lock manager.
# In Classic mode, the size given is used for the initial allocation. The
# table expands dynamically up to the limit of memory. In SuperServer, the
# initial size is also the final size.
#
# Type: integer
#
#LockMemSize = 1048576
#
# Tune lock hash list; more hash slots mean shorter hash chains. Only
# necessary under very high load. Prime number values are recommended.
#
# Type: integer
#
#LockHashSlots = 1009
thanks by advance
stephane
yes, all use the same charset (ISO8859_1) but we store all the string in UTF8 inside the database...
about the server ram, actually it is 18 GO Used of 32 Go. the fb_inet_server.exe have a private working set of 250 mo and around 30 threads.
do you thing i must play with this params in the firebird.conf :
# ----------------------------
# Locking and shared memory parameters
#
# Bytes of shared memory allocated for lock manager.
# In Classic mode, the size given is used for the initial allocation. The
# table expands dynamically up to the limit of memory. In SuperServer, the
# initial size is also the final size.
#
# Type: integer
#
#LockMemSize = 1048576
#
# Tune lock hash list; more hash slots mean shorter hash chains. Only
# necessary under very high load. Prime number values are recommended.
#
# Type: integer
#
#LockHashSlots = 1009
thanks by advance
stephane
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Alan McDonald" <alan@...> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > Du to the problem we have with Firebird 2.1.4 (i will try to compile
> > the demo project to simulate the problem monday), we decide to update
> > the database to FB2.5 in ou production server (even if it a release,
> > can not be worse than the actual FB2.1.4)
> >
>
> are all your connections using the same charset?
> do you observe the server's RAM useage over time?
> Alan
>