Subject | Re: The age old 'count' issue... |
---|---|
Author | vladman992000 |
Post date | 2010-02-24T14:25:42Z |
--- In firebird-support@yahoogroups.com, "Martijn Tonies" <m.tonies@...> wrote:
Myles
> Does this mean that a "View Page 2" link -reruns- the search query? If so,Yes, you are correct. I'm definitely up for rethinking this whole thing, but gotta keep those users happy :)
> you
> should really rethink that strategy.
> Storing the search result into a table (create a "header table" with aI might be able to do something like that for some queries. The problem is that the user typically filters all views and in a way that I'd have hundreds if not thousands of those queries being stored persistently and being invalidated every second or so. I could certainly cut down some of the searching by doing it this way. But I don't think it would work for most of my users and their ever-changing searching needs.
> timestamp for
> the query, use a "detail table" for the actual result records, run a job
> every so often
> to delete old searches) really is the way to go.
Myles