Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Temp tables between apps |
---|---|
Author | Venus Software Operations |
Post date | 2010-10-06T06:25:18Z |
On 06/10/2010 12:25, unordained wrote:
Kind regards
Bhavbhuti
>Thanks a lot for your reply Philip
> ---------- Original Message -----------
> From: Venus Software Operations <venussoftop@...
> <mailto:venussoftop%40gmail.com>>
> > I had tried to use Temp Tables in my app, that was fine. Now these
> > temp records needed to be access in a different app, Report Manager,
> > for reporting purposes and this was not possible because RM was not
> > able to see the temp records created in my app.
> >
> > Is there any solution except a regular table in which the records then
> > are added and deleted as required.
> ------- End of Original Message -------
>
> Short answer: no.
>
> Long answer: temporary table contents are bound either to the
> transaction or the
> connection; so at a minimum, to keep the contents from disappearing,
> the two apps
> would need to share and/or hand-off the connection (e.g. tcp/ip
> socket, but
> Firebird can use several connection methods) itself. If the two apps
> were, say,
> Apache Modules or Web Applications living in the same container, it
> might be
> possible to hand off the connections between threads; on the same
> machine, it
> might be possible (via forking, shared memory, etc.) for two processes
> to hand
> off the connection. You could probably also create a proxy process
> that opens
> connections and keeps them open, accepting new connections from
> various apps on
> the network and shunting them into existing DB connections, allowing
> them to hand-
> off without the proxy closing its handle to the database, keeping
> temporary data
> alive. I've not seen it done, and it's extremely unlikely not to be an
> entirely
> overblown solution for your needs. Use persistent tables.
>
> -Philip
>
>
Kind regards
Bhavbhuti