Subject | Re: [firebird-support] Re: Wanting to shift from firebird 1.0.3 on redhat to 2.1.2 on windows server 20 |
---|---|
Author | Lester Caine |
Post date | 2009-07-24T06:00:43Z |
anthony.bydeveldt wrote:
'which xxx field is correct'. Prior to applying the rule, if there were two or
more fields with the same name and you did not correctly alias the one you
wanted to use, it was selected a little at random, so if they had different
data in you did not know what you would get. Now you get a complaint if
Firebird is not sure which one to use .... even if the field has to contain
the same data since you have used it as the link between two tables, but that
is just consistency since it removes the need to prove that the field is the same.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php
> Just 1 more question guys!That problem has little to do with 'standards compliance' and more to do with
>
> Can anyone tell me which SQL standard the ambiguity rule relating to table aliases was introduced?
>
> I understand that the rule wasn't enforced until firebird v2, but I wanted to know which SQL standard that was introduced into.
>
> I am planning on getting the developer to change the software based on it not being SQL standard compliant, as we will be using this software into the foreseeable future and we don't want to get stuck on a 2004 version database server.
'which xxx field is correct'. Prior to applying the rule, if there were two or
more fields with the same name and you did not correctly alias the one you
wanted to use, it was selected a little at random, so if they had different
data in you did not know what you would get. Now you get a complaint if
Firebird is not sure which one to use .... even if the field has to contain
the same data since you have used it as the link between two tables, but that
is just consistency since it removes the need to prove that the field is the same.
--
Lester Caine - G8HFL
-----------------------------
Contact - http://lsces.co.uk/wiki/?page=contact
L.S.Caine Electronic Services - http://lsces.co.uk
EnquirySolve - http://enquirysolve.com/
Model Engineers Digital Workshop - http://medw.co.uk//
Firebird - http://www.firebirdsql.org/index.php