Hi,

> Changing the behavior of a switch might break some things and can
> therefor be considered a 'tough' decision, but adding yet another switch
> to preserve backwards compatibility leads to an ever expanding choice
> and thus to expanding confusion.

Got your point.

> BTW: From what I understood from the development list, the option gstat
> -a -s could be used to get the same output as gstat -s currently gives.

Still break actual code, but... I agree, that -- IMHO -- would be fine.


Regards,
Anderson Farias