I incorrectly wrote:

> As for the other 250,000 reads, I thought I remembered something about
> the engine double reading rows when evaluating LIKE/STARTING WITH
> clauses, but I can't find a case in the tracker for this.

That should have read:

As for the other 250,000 reads, I'm not sure.

I thought I remembered something about an engine bug which cased the
engine to double read rows when evaluating LIKE/STARTING WITH clauses,
but I can't find a case in the tracker so I can't be sure. Perhaps
someone else can help here.



Sean