Subject | Re: [firebird-support] How to convert TIMESTAMP to unix timestamp (number of seconds since epoch) |
---|---|
Author | Kjell Rilbe |
Post date | 2009-06-11T08:49:58Z |
Lester Caine wrote:
It seems to me that the distinction between lose/loose is more often a
problem (is it really a problem?) to native English speakers than us who
have learned it the hard way: in school. Odd!
Kjell
--
------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> Kjell Rilbe wrote:As opposed to your second language SQL? ;-)
> >> anything - but that is because you may not have the missing information
> >> to loose.
> >> to ^^^^^
> >
> > Ahemmm... That should be "lose" actually. :-) "Loose" means "not fixed"
> > or some such.
>
> Well if you don't know where the timestamp was located then it's "not
> fixed" ;)
> English may be my only language but it does not mean I can actually use
> it properly :)
It seems to me that the distinction between lose/loose is more often a
problem (is it really a problem?) to native English speakers than us who
have learned it the hard way: in school. Odd!
Kjell
--
------------------------------
Kjell Rilbe
DataDIA AB
E-post: kjell.rilbe@...
Telefon: 08-761 06 55
Mobil: 0733-44 24 64
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]