Subject | RE: [firebird-support] Still About performance and running slow |
---|---|
Author | Allies Xposs |
Post date | 2009-04-27T08:23:34Z |
@nigel...
Select * from .. where ...order by.... i use if have little Field ( 3-5 field).
I just Confuse... First Running From Feb 2008 - November 2008 Its OK. Not Slow Down.
But desember 2008 starting slow...
Select * from .. where ...order by.... i use if have little Field ( 3-5 field).
I just Confuse... First Running From Feb 2008 - November 2008 Its OK. Not Slow Down.
But desember 2008 starting slow...
--- On Mon, 4/27/09, Nigel Weeks <nweeks@...> wrote:
From: Nigel Weeks <nweeks@...>
Subject: RE: [firebird-support] Still About performance and running slow
To: firebird-support@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, April 27, 2009, 2:50 AM
Hmm...
You aren't doing any highly CPU intensive queries like:
'select count(*) from table' for paging through records?
i.e., Page 4 of 300 records with 50 records per page?
(Terribly sorry if this answer has already been provided...)
Nige.
> For All....
> I am sorry... i am wrong sent the database statistic. and this database
> statistic and Ibconsole after my application Slow down....
> I am Confuse because this application start running at feb 2008. and until
> Desember 2008 starting slow down .. and try to move record to database backup
> and run Backup and restore, well done. But start february 2009 every 1 month
> must be remove data transaction to backup database and must be backup restore
> for more faster on my application. but this month, 2 week running my application
> slow down again. Need correcting on my database server and parameter to make the
> best performance.
> Spec Server :
> Window server 2000
> interbase 6.0
> Intel P IV xeon
> 2 gb RAM
> HD scsi 100 gb
> 40 Client Computer to access database
>
> IbConfig:
> #V4_LOCK_MEM_ SIZE 98304
> #V4_LOCK_SEM_ COUNT 32
> #V4_LOCK_SIGNAL 16
> #V4_EVENT_MEM_ SIZE 32768
> #DATABASE_CACHE_ PAGES 10000
> #SERVER_PRIORITY_ CLASS 1
> #SERVER_CLIENT_ MAPPING 4096
> #SERVER_WORKING_ SIZE_MIN 0
> #SERVER_WORKING_ SIZE_MAX 0
> #V4_LOCK_GRANT_ ORDER 1
> #ANY_LOCK_MEM_ SIZE 98304
> #ANY_LOCK_SEM_ COUNT 32
> #ANY_LOCK_SIGNAL 16
> #ANY_EVENT_MEM_ SIZE 32768
> #CPU_AFFINITY 1
>
> Database Statistic:
> Database "c:\data\myxpossdb2 50409.gdb"
>
> Database header page information:
> Flags 0
> Checksum 12345
> Generation 8840430
> Page size 8192
> ODS version 10.1
> Oldest transaction 8840412
> Oldest active 8840413
> Oldest snapshot 8840413
> Next transaction 8840419
> Bumped transaction 1
> Sequence number 0
> Next attachment ID 0
> Implementation ID 16
> Shadow count 0
> Page buffers 0
> Next header page 0
> Database dialect 3
> Creation date Apr 4, 2009 7:52:21
> Attributes force write
>
> Variable header data:
> Sweep interval: 20000
> *END*
>
>
> Database file sequence:
> File c:\data\myxpossdb25 0409.gdb is the only file
>
> Database log page information:
> Creation date
> Log flags: 2
> No write ahead log
>
> Next log page: 0
>
> Variable log data:
> Control Point 1:
> File name:
> Partition offset: 0 Seqno: 0 Offset: 0
> Control Point 2:
> File name:
> Partition offset: 0 Seqno: 0 Offset: 0
> Current File:
> File name:
> Partition offset: 0 Seqno: 0 Offset: 0
> *END*
>
> Analyzing database pages ...
> MYSS (179)
> Primary pointer page: 319, Index root page: 320
> Data pages: 744, data page slots: 1599, average fill: 49%
> Fill distribution:
> 0 - 19% = 254
> 20 - 39% = 39
> 40 - 59% = 27
> 60 - 79% = 263
> 80 - 99% = 161
>
> Index MYSS1 (1)
> Depth: 2, leaf buckets: 11, nodes: 11558
> Average data length: 0.00, total dup: 10313, max dup: 172
> Fill distribution:
> 0 - 19% = 0
> 20 - 39% = 0
> 40 - 59% = 3
> 60 - 79% = 0
> 80 - 99% = 8
>
> Index MYSS2 (0)
> Depth: 2, leaf buckets: 15, nodes: 11541
> Average data length: 0.00, total dup: 11517, max dup: 1916
> Fill distribution:
> 0 - 19% = 1
> 20 - 39% = 1
> 40 - 59% = 8
> 60 - 79% = 1
> 80 - 99% = 4
>
> Index MYSS3 (3)
> Depth: 2, leaf buckets: 13, nodes: 11558
> Average data length: 1.00, total dup: 9792, max dup: 172
> Fill distribution:
> 0 - 19% = 1
> 20 - 39% = 1
> 40 - 59% = 2
> 60 - 79% = 1
> 80 - 99% = 8
>
> ASAP, Hope Solution/idea/ correcting on my database server.
> Thanks....
>
> --- On Fri, 4/24/09, Leyne, Sean <Sean@BroadViewSoftw are.com> wrote:
>
> From: Leyne, Sean <Sean@BroadViewSoftw are.com>
> Subject: RE: [firebird-support] Still About performance and running slow
> To: firebird-support@ yahoogroups. com
> Date: Friday, April 24, 2009, 5:53 PM
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Douglas,
>
>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Leyne, Sean
> <Sean@broadviewsoft w are.com>
>> wrote:
>> >> Oldest transaction 434
>> >> Oldest active 8366
>> >> Oldest snapshot 8366
>> >
>> > You have a database transaction that is not committing!
>>
>> The difference between Oldest Transaction and Oldest Active is the
>> number o transactions that need sweeping.
>> When transactions are left uncommited, it's the difference between
>> Oldest Active and Next that increases.
>
> You are correct, my bad!
>
> I was too quick in reviewing the details... ;-[
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
--
Nigel Weeks
Prism9 Technology
e: nweeks@prism9. com.au
m: 0408 133 738
w:http://prism9. com
fb:http://facebook. com/profile. php?id=604592926
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]