Subject | Re: [firebird-support] optimizing table size, is it worth it? |
---|---|
Author | Hannes Streicher |
Post date | 2009-04-25T06:32:59Z |
Guten Tag car.toper,
am Freitag, 24. April 2009 um 15:09 schrieben Sie:
so the size of your record as defined will have nothing to do with the size
of the record store on disk
,
--
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
Hannes Streicher mailto:HStreicher@...
am Freitag, 24. April 2009 um 15:09 schrieben Sie:
> I am wondering... Is it worth while to optimize tables to fit intoNo : Firebird uses Run Length Encoding of the records it stores on disk
> pages? My thought is that if you had a simple table:
> id integer
> name char(10)
> Rather than leave the name at 10 char's, round it up to 12 so the
> table is 16 bytes and will fit into a sector nicely. The only catch
> is that all the tables will have varchar's of lengths over 50 most
> of the time. Would that null and void such an optimization or not? Here is an example:
so the size of your record as defined will have nothing to do with the size
of the record store on disk
,
--
Mit freundlichen GrĂ¼ssen
Hannes Streicher mailto:HStreicher@...